當前位置

首頁 > 英語閱讀 > 雙語新聞 > 中國可以僅僅通過抄襲和模仿從而替代美國成爲超級強國嗎

中國可以僅僅通過抄襲和模仿從而替代美國成爲超級強國嗎

推薦人: 來源: 閱讀: 2.62W 次

China is working on a copy of the F 15 Eagle fighter jet and they have named it J 16. This is just their latest known endeavor in copying Americans. In E commerce they have copied Twitter Uber Google Ebay etc. U.S.A has a machine on Mars. Quite a feat. Doesn't China need to be innovative too?

中國可以僅僅通過抄襲和模仿從而替代美國成爲超級強國嗎
中國正在複製F 15鷹戰鬥機,他們命名它爲J 16。這只是他們最新的模仿美國人所做的努力。在電子商務方面,他們已經複製了推特,Uber,谷歌,易趣網等。美國在火星上有一臺機器。真是一項偉業。中國不需要創新嗎?

A2A. China is not a superpower. It has never proposed that it would become one. To be a superpower you need to be both economic and military dominance that it projects its power over areas and countries far beyond its own borders. To date modern China has maintained its military strictly for the defence of its territory.

區對區,中國並沒有制霸全球,也從來沒打算要問鼎天下。欲爲超級大國,你需要有經濟和軍事上的統治支配力,在遠超國界之外的各個地域和國家部署你的權力。而當下新中國的軍事僅爲維持其領土的防禦。

OK let’s talk about copying & imitating in business. Does this happen world wide? Yes it happens everyday in every country. In business we have a euphemism called - "being competitive”. It consists of the practise of imitating what your competition is doing successfully. You see this literally everyday and it has been going on since business strategy was created. In your country is there only ONE hamburger or chicken or coffee or drugstore chain or cable TV network or one smart phone that has different features than all the other ones? NO because 95% of the time business all over the world function by imitating success and 5% of the time they are disruptors and innovate something different.

好吧,讓我們談談商業領域的複製和模仿。這事兒全世界都有嗎?是的,它每天都在每個國家發生。在商業上,我們有一個委婉的說法叫“競爭”。這包括模仿正在大獲成功的競爭對手。你每天都會看到這一點,而自從商業戰略問世以來,它就一直存在。你的國家是否只有一種漢堡包,或一種雞肉,一種咖啡,一家藥店連鎖,一家有線電視網,一個跟其他所有手機有着完全不同功能的智能手機呢?不是的。因爲全世界的商業,其中95%是在效仿成功模式,而只有5%是來踢館的,搞點革新什麼的。

When Japan auto industry nearly killed the US auto industry in the later part of 20th century; did they reinvent cars? NO. They improved the quality of what US manufacturers had designed to give the consumer what they wanted and what they wanted was Japanese cars not American ones which forced US car manufacturers copy Japanese manufacturers. IRONIC isn’t it?

在20世紀下半葉日本汽車工業幾乎摧毀美國汽車工業的時候,是他們重新發明了汽車嗎?不,他們提高了美國製造商者的設計質量,給了消費者他們所想要的。所以當人們想要的是日本車而不是美國車時,這又迫使美國汽車製造商抄襲日本製造商。這很諷刺不是嗎?

A number of people believe Apple is not a company that invents. Rather it takes what others have already invented and applies those things in a different way. Yet Apple is rated by many as innovative.

許多人認爲蘋果是不是一個原創公司。相反,它摘取了別人已經發明的東西並把這些東西以不同的方式付諸應用。然而,蘋果被很很多人奉爲革新者。

To a degree what China has done to date is similar to what Japan did in the 1970’s and for the next 30 odd years. China is the world’s factory in large measure because it can produce things in great volume and at lower overall cost compared to others giving western businesses & multi-national companies higher profit margins.

在某種程度上說,迄今爲止中國的行爲類似於日本在70年代以及之後剩餘的30年裏所做之事。中國是巨型規模的世界工廠,因爲它能用比別人更低的總成本生產大量物品,從而給西方企業和跨國企業帶來更高的利潤。