當前位置

首頁 > 英語作文 > 英語寫作經驗 > 託福寫作機經是什麼

託福寫作機經是什麼

推薦人: 來源: 閱讀: 1.99W 次

許多初次報考託福的同學不知道什麼是託福寫作機經,下面小編給大家解釋一下,希望能幫助到大家!

託福寫作機經是什麼

託福寫作機經是什麼

這個名詞的由來和雅思機經相差無幾。機經指的是上機考試經驗,最先起源於托福考試,即對上機考試題目的回憶總結。托福考試完全是上機考試作答,所以烤鴨們就親切的稱之爲機經。機經內容含聽力,閱讀,寫作及口語面試題目等。其中寫作和口語部分對備考託福的考生幫助很大。從另一個角度研究託福歷年考題,半年題庫變更一次,是完全可以遇到重複題目的。但其答案准確性衆說紛紜,並不完全標準,製作僅供研究參考。

2020年1月12日託福獨立寫作機經解析

話題分類

生活方式

題型

多選一題型(三選一題型)

考題回憶

Which one would you choose to change to keep healthy?

1. The kind of food you eat

2. The amount of exercises you do

3. The amount of stress you withstand

解題思路

如果選擇1

改變食物種類很簡單(吃飯稍微注意一下就可以)

運動做的再好,但是不改變食物種類是沒用的

壓力是不容易改變的(任務不可減少)

如果選擇2

改變運動是很簡單的(因爲可以做一些簡單的運動,比如慢跑)

改變食物很難(食物種類取決於周圍的飯店)

壓力是不容易改變的(任務不可減少)

如果選擇3 (本文選擇3)

改變食物很難(食物種類取決於周圍的飯店)

壓力大導致改變運動量很難實現

減少壓力可以改善睡眠

參考範文

Health is one of the main concerns of people all over the world, since without good health, people will find it hard to enjoy life, let alone fulfilling their responsibility in the society. But people’s ideas vary when come to the topic of how to maintain good health. Some people prefer to change the food they eat, so that they could feel good about themselves, while others may argue that doing more exercise is much better, as it can consume the extra calories. However, from my perspective, reducing stress that people withstand is the best way to keep healthy.

To begin with, it is not easy to change the food people eat. Most people have to study in school or work in companies. Therefore, what they can eat at lunch greatly depends on what is being offered in the neighborhood. It is because students or office staff often only have about one hour at noon which is only enough for them to go to some places nearby. If they are lucky enough to have healthy food restaurant around, like vegetables, they could have a better chance to carry out this method. But most people are surrounded by various kinds of junk food, since junk food is usually tastier and more attractive. Therefore, people couldn’t be expected to change the food they eat easily. In addition, even though they do manage to change somehow, they couldn’t ensure that they could eat regularly with a lot of stress and they tend to have meals at odd hours, which is definitely not beneficial to their health.

Moreover, people may give up changing the amount of exercise soon. People have tons of work or study assignments every day, and thus they have lots of stress, which means they usually barely have time to complete all the required tasks at work or in school. In this case, even though they want to do more exercises every day, they wouldn’t have time to. For example, a person may have to go to work at 8 in the morning and come back home at 7 in the afternoon. He/she may even have to continue to work after reaching home until late. In this case, even though he/she decides to increase the amount of exercise for the sake of health, stress may make him/her give up after even the first try.

Furthermore, reducing stress could help people get better sleep. With so much stress resulting from tons of work or assignments, people could hardly get enough sleep at night. For example, because people have to get up early and stay up late for assignments or projects, on average, people in the city could only get 5 to 6 hours sleep per night, which is not really sufficient to maintain good health, since night time is critical to the recovering of vital organs. However, reducing stress could offer people more sleep at night and thus having better health.

Since it is hard to change the food people eat and the amount of exercises people do, reducing stress is the best way for people to stay healthy.

2020年1月11日託福獨立寫作機經與解析

話題分類

政府類

題型

對比類

考題回憶

Do you agree or disagree the following statement?

It is more important for government to spend money on building new housing than preserving historic and traditional buildings.

解題思路

政府類話題可以通過分類討論方法來寫。

貧窮的國家應該花錢building new housing,可以方便國民生活工作。

富裕的國家應該花錢preserving historic and traditional buildings,可以促進經濟和教育發展。

參考範文

With the development of technology, people today are used to a more convenient way which high-tech facilities bring us. Besides, some fictions even create an attracting image that people can live an easy life with the help of smart furniture and auto facilities. Therefore, many people believe firmly that government should put effort on building new housing in order to promote their living standards. However, to be more discreet, we cannot take the statement for granted, especially considering the various development stages different countries are in. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, this claim should be analyzed in a case-by-case situation.

Admittedly, it cannot be denied that building new housing is a significant factor for the improvement of living standards, especially when we take underdeveloped countries into account. Most of those countries have suffered widespread wars, starvation and diseases, so it is not likely for the governments to set aside expense focusing on preserving traditional buildings. Those counties, on the other hand, should construct new buildings with advanced and convenient facilities to enhance citizens basic living standards. For instance, Sudan, one of the most underdeveloped countries in the world, has been suffering continuous civil wars in last fifty years. People in Sudan struggled with endless starvation and diseases. In order to address those problems, the government in Sudan needs to build new factories with efficient facilities to rapidly produce large amount of food. Apart from new plants, it is also urgent for the government to build new homes with ventilation system and hygiene-assured water circulation system. With the construction of new buildings, the elimination of starvation and malaria in the future is very promising, by which the living standards can be improved. Therefore, for underprivileged countries, new buildings with effective apparatus are of greater importance than historic buildings.

However, if we only discussed situations in backward countries, it would be too biased to see things comprehensively, especially when we look closely into developed countries. Preserving traditional buildings is a significant factor for the successful way of education and economical growth. Taking a tour to those historic site, students can vividly learn some events their predecessors lived through or some feats their ancestors had achieved so that they are willing to respect and protect their culture and history. Besides, historic sites can attract foreign tourists, in which can not only benefit the tourism, but also accommodation, food or other related industry. The experience of the US can manifest this viewpoint. Although it is costly for a country to invest in housing preservation, America has been increasing its investment in this field in recent years, since America possesses a financial foundation strong enough to support the improvement of traditional buildings. With the support from the government, Americans, especially young adults, can easily gain the national identity. Besides, with the improved historic buildings, the tourism boosts in recent years, which, in turn, brings economical benefits to the the country. Historic buildings, like Lincoln Memorial and Washington Monument, attract thousands of tourists overseas to visit America. As the tourism and related industry develop, the revenue and employments increases by millions accordingly.

Based on the aforementioned discussion, we can conclude that the statement is biased. For underprivileged countries, the valid part of this statement should never be underestimated. However, when developed countries are involved, it would be reasonable for us to maintain that this statement is over-generalized.