支持不廢除死刑 Death Penalty Should Exist

Althoughthe problem of keeping or abolishing death penalty has not reached an agreementin the long debate, the argument put by the two sides enables us to stand onthe forefathers’ shoulder to view this problem: should death penalty be abolished?Different people have different opinions. I think it should not be followings are my reasons:

關於死刑的存廢，數百年的爭論雖然沒有使這一問題形成定論，但爭論使存廢兩派的支持者發揮得淋漓盡致，使我們有機會站在前人的肩膀上冷靜地看待這個問題：死刑到底應不應該廢除？我的答案是不該廢除。以下是我的觀點:

Firstly,death penalty is the necessary way to punish some special crimes. As oursociety is very complicated, it is easy to appear some series crimes. Thosecrimes are not forgiven. In order to keep the society stable, the governmentshould publish those people by death penalty. Otherwise, the society will notbe safe.

首先，死刑是對付特定惡性犯罪的必要手段。由於社會狀況複雜，難免在一定時期出現窮兇極惡的犯罪。這些犯罪都是不可原諒的。爲了保持社會穩定，政府應該用死刑來懲罰那些人。否則這個社會將不再安全。

Secondly,when a person kills people, he does not receive death penalty, but other punishment,like life imprisonment. Does anybody think that life imprisonment is a waste ofresource, and once the prisoner runs away from the prison, it is dangerous tothe society? While death penalty won’t make that happen. Therefore, deathpenalty cannot be replaced by other punishment.

第二，當一個人殺人後，他沒有被處以死刑，而是其他的懲罰，如終身監禁。有沒有人覺得終身監禁是在浪費資源，而且一旦囚犯從 監獄中逃脫，這個社會就會變得很危險。而死刑不會讓這種事發生。所以，死刑不能由別的懲罰代替。

Recently,Norway suffered a huge explosion and a shooting, which declaring the abolitionof capital punishment is unwise. Nearly a hundred people died in the two eventsthat were and made by the same boy. However, as the law is too permissive, theboy was sentenced to imprisonment for 14 years and he could be released onparole. Norwegians worry about that the people who cause great harm cannot be r 14 years, he can walk in the street again, which it is very rding to the survey, 80% of Norwegians want the boy to be sentenced todeath, but the Norwegian law doesn't have the death penalty. The example can bequite clear that death penalty should exist.

最近，挪威遭受了一次巨大的爆炸和槍擊，這就說明了廢除死刑是不明智的。近百人在這兩個事件中死亡，而製造這些事件的人都是同一個男孩。然而，由於法律寬容，男孩只被判處14年監禁，而且他也可以被假釋。挪威人擔心造成這麼大傷害的人而不處決。14年後，他又可以在街上行走，真的是很嚇人。據調查，80%的人希望這孩子被判處死刑，但挪威法律沒有死刑。這個例子可以很清楚地證明應存在死刑。

Inshort, the death penalty helps society become stable. China's securities needthe death penalty. So, I think it should not be abolished.

總之，死刑讓社會變得更穩定。中國的安定需要死刑。所以，我認爲死刑不應該被廢除。