表現差者不能通過考試 Badly Performed Students Should Fail the Exam

According to the authoritativereport, the number of college student is growth, while the quality is not asgood as before. In the meantime, whether students perform badly should fail thecourse have spoken much debate? Some assert that school should not be sodesperate, just turning a blind eye to their behavior, while others convincesthat student should take their responsibility for their performance. Personally, I’min favor of second one.

據權威報告，大學生的數量持續上漲，而質量卻不如以前好。同時，表現不好的學生是否應該不通過考試已經有了很多的辯論？有的人認爲學校不應該如此絕望，對學生的行爲只是視而不見，而另一些人認爲學生應該爲他們的行爲負責。就我個人而言，我支持第二個觀點。

Convince arguments can be madethat if school let all students pass the course, it will increase theirlaziness. To start with, students will not worry about being registered bydisciplinary inspector when they get up late. Therefore some of them will playcomputer games very late until midnight. Some students even don’t attend theclass and finish assignments. They hold a view on mind: even they get a lowscore on final exam, they still can pass it. Besides, some students do somepart-time jobs or join in student union but they can’t be the excuses forescaping learning.  Finally, if teachersget all students through the exam, it must be unfair to struggling students anddamage school's reputation.

使人信服的理由有，如果學校讓學生通過課程考試，會增加他們惰性。首先，學生們不用擔心起牀晚了被紀律檢查員記名。因此，有一些人會玩電腦遊戲玩到很晚，一直到午夜。甚至有些學生不上課，也不寫作業。他們堅定的認爲：即使他們期末考試的時候分數很低，他們仍然會及格。此外，一些學生做一些兼職工作或參加學生會，但都不能作爲逃避學習的藉口。最後，如果教師讓所有的學生通過了考試，對那些努力學習的學生肯定是不公平的，也會損害學校的聲譽。

In summary, I would concede thatstudents who perform badly should be fail, as it makes students more lazy,damage school's reputation and unfair to the diligent students.

總之，我認爲那些表現不好的學生應該不及格，因爲這樣會使學生變得更懶，損害學校的聲譽而且對勤奮學習的學生不公平。