應要求學生住宿 Students should be required to live in school dormitory

Forsome time now, some students have been arguing that they are old enough not tolive in the school dormitory. Given student’s safety, I do believe that theyshould be required to live in school dorms.

日前，一些學生爭辯說他們已經年齡夠大了，不應該住學生宿舍了。爲了學生的安全，我認爲應該要求學生住宿。

Firstof all, living in school dormitory provides students with guaranteed safety toa great extent while living outside school has foreshadowed some risks. Oncesomething unpredictable happens students would be put into jeopardy and suffersfrom a hard-to-protect loss. By contrast, in case of dormers,constant help from roommates and teachers on duty would pull them out ofpossible danger in time. Safety is the basic need of humans without which allother human functions will be in question.

首先，住在學生宿舍在安全方面提供了很大的保障，然而住在學校外很可能面臨一些危險。一旦一些不可預計的事情發生了，學生就會陷入危險，遭受大損失。相比之下，住校的學生，可以相互幫助，執勤老師也會及時地幫學生擺脫危險。安全是人類的基本需要，沒有安全，其他的事情也無從說起。

Second,living in school dormitory would make it easy to enjoy the clubs, parties andother social occasions that are essential for the so-called bonds amongstudents. Students could make more friends besides their classmates, never toobad to have lots friends.

第二，住在宿舍更容易去參加俱樂部，派對，還有其他的社交活動，這對於學生之間增加感情是必不可少的。學生們可以交到除了同學之外的朋友，朋友多永遠不會是壞事情。

Finally,students want to living outside for the most reason is to have freedom, andmostly, they want to live with their boyfriends or girlfriends. I consider itis a bad idea. Students who are living outside for this reason will probablylead to an abandoned academic problem, because they are easily to skip classfor hanging out together.

最後，學生想要住在外面的主要原因是想要自由，其中更多的原因是他們想和男朋友或者女朋友住在一起。我認爲這是一個壞主意。爲了這種原因外宿的學生很可能會導致荒廢學業的問題，因爲他們很可能會翹課一起出去玩。

Tosum up, students should be required to live in school dormitory, not only fortheir own safety, but also for their studies.

總之，應當要求學生住宿，不僅僅是爲了他們的安全着想，也爲了他們的學業。