FT公佈年高管教育課程排名

Spanish business school Iese has topped the Financial Times 2015 combined ranking of executive short courses, regaining the position it last held in 2012. The school ousted HEC Paris, which dropped to second place in the combined table.

西班牙Iese商學院在英國《金融時報》2015年高管短期課程綜合排行榜上拔得頭籌，該學校上次獲得這一殊榮是在2012年。去年排名第一的法國巴黎高等商學院(HEC Paris)今年屈居第二。

Iese’s particular achievement was coming top of the ranking for customised programmes — those aimed at corporate customers. The school is only the fifth to top the customised ranking. It puts an end to 12 years of domination by Duke Corporate Education. Before that, the last winner was New York’s Columbia Business School in 2002. Duke drops to third overall after falling more than 10 places in five criteria, including “follow-up”, in which it dropped 27 places to 40th.

Iese商學院尤爲突出的成績表現在，登上了針對企業客戶的定製課程排行榜的榜首。該學院是第5個登頂該排行榜的學校。它結束了杜克企業教育學院(Duke Corporate Education)長達12年的霸主地位。在此之前，2002年的冠軍是紐約哥倫比亞大學商學院(Columbia Business School)。杜克企業教育學院的此項排名滑落至第三，在5項指標中的排名下滑超過10位（其中在“後續跟進”指標上的排名下滑27位，至第40名）。

The Financial Times executive education rankings, now in their 17th year, rate the best 75 open programmes and the best 85 customised programmes worldwide. Executive education offers non-degree programmes, either tailor-made for corporate customers (customised) or available to all working managers (open). The rankings are based on participants’ and clients’ satisfaction, the diversity of participants and faculty, and the schools’ international exposure.

英國《金融時報》高管教育排行榜已進入第17個年頭，排行榜選出全球75項最佳開放課程以及85項最佳定製課程，並對它們進行排名。高管教育提供非學位課程，要麼是針對企業客戶的定製課程，要麼是針對所有在職管理人員的開放課程。排名基於學員和客戶的滿意度、學員和師資的多樣性以及學校的國際交流活躍度。

Iese, third in the customised ranking for the past three years, overtook HEC Paris, the runner-up since 2009, and made it to the top of the ranking for the first time. Iese is rewarded for performing consistently well across all 15 criteria. While the school is ranked first for faculty diversity only, it is in the top 10 for all remaining criteria. It is second for preparation and third for programme design and value for money.

過去3年在定製課程排行榜上一直位居第三的Iese，取代自2009年一直穩居亞軍位置的法國巴黎高等商學院，首次在該排行榜上登頂。Iese獲此殊榮的原因是，其在所有15項指標中取得了統一的良好成績。該學院僅在師資多樣性方面排名第一，在其他所有指標上均排在前10名。該學院在籌備指標上排名第二，在課程設計和性價比上排名第三。

This is Iese’s best performance overall across the two rankings. In addition to being number one for customised programmes, it is third for open-enrolment programmes.

今年是Iese在兩個排行榜上總體表現最好的一年。除了在定製課程排行榜上位居冠軍之外，Iese在開放註冊課程中排名第三。

Other notable performances in the customised programme rankings include ESCP Europe of France, which enjoyed the biggest jump, up 28 places to 28th. Olin Business School at Washington University had the biggest fall, dropping 31 places to 55th. The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania recorded its worst performance, down 21 places to 47th. Nine schools were ranked for the first time. Antai College of Economics and Management at Shanghai Jiao Tong University was the highest entrant, in 15th position.

在定製課程排行榜上，其他表現突出的學校包括ESCP歐洲商學院(ESCP Europe)，該學院排名上升幅度最大，上升28位，至第28名。華盛頓大學(Washington University)奧林商學院(Olin Business School)排名降幅最大，下降31位，至第55名。今年是賓夕法尼亞大學(University of Pennsylvania)沃頓商學院(Wharton School)表現最差的一年，它的排名下滑21位，至第47名。有9所商學院是首次上榜。上海交通大學安泰經濟與管理學院(Antai College of Economics and Management)是排名最高的新上榜學校，排在第15位。

The ranking of 75 open-enrolment programmes was led by IMD of Switzerland for the fourth year running. HEC Paris moved up one place to second, while Iese came third.

在75項開放註冊課程排行榜上，瑞士的國際管理髮展學院(IMD)連續第四年榮登榜首。法國巴黎高等商學院的排名上升一個位置，成爲亞軍，Iese位居第三。

Fundação Dom Cabral of Brazil, a former top 10 school, showed one of the biggest improvements, rising 11 places to 12th. Cambridge Judge Business School was ranked highest among the six new entrants, in 50th place.

巴西Fundação Dom Cabral是排名上升最快的學校之一，在該項排名中上升11個位置，至第12名，之前該校曾躋身前10名。劍橋大學賈奇商學院(Cambridge Judge Business School)在6所新上榜院校中排名最高，位列第50名。

Schools’ main asset is their faculty. Faculty are rated highest in both open and customised programmes according to the quality of their teaching, the coherence of their courses and their approachability.

各商學院的主要優勢是教師。師資力量在開放課程和定製課程中的得分均爲最高，得分基於授課質量、課程連貫性以及教師的親和力。

Follow-up after courses, on the other hand, is the weakest area for both types of programmes. Formal support in open programmes was given the lowest rating, of 7.6 out of 10. Ease of implementation was also a key concern. “The course I attended was not easily tailored to my needs,” said one senior manager of a leadership course. “More tailoring of tools to assist in follow-up and implementation would have be useful.”

課程結業後的後續跟進在兩類課程中則均爲最薄弱環節。開放課程在正式支持指標中的得分最低，爲7.6分（總分10分）。執行的容易程度也是一個主要問題。“我參加的課程不容易被定製爲符合我需求的樣子，”參加了一門領導力課程的一位高級管理人員表示，“對工具進行更多定製，以協助後續跟進和執行將是有用的。”

Nonetheless, the vast majority of participants reported their course met their personal and professional expectations and said they would strongly recommend it. Corporate customers were equally satisfied: two-thirds said they would use the same school again for the same programme.

然而，大部分學員表示，他們參加的課程達到了個人和職業預期，他們將強烈推薦這些課程。企業客戶也同樣滿意：三分之二的受訪者表示，將在學習同類課程時再次選擇目前的學校。