零基礎雅思寫作如何練習
有的考生當初次接觸雅思寫作時，根本不清楚要怎麼合理練習纔可以獲得寫作高分。以下爲大家介紹了零基礎雅思寫作如何練習。
零基礎雅思寫作如何練習
零基礎雅思寫作如何練習?模仿寫作類似於、但不同於漢譯英。模仿寫作有一個要求，即文章原本必須要是英語文章，同時還有十分正統的漢語翻譯。我們在訓練的時候，先不要英語原文，而是看着翻譯過來的漢語，先把它翻回英文。後面再與英語原文對照。有比較就有鑑別。
通過這種比較，大家可以認爲是同樣一個意思，人家用那個詞，那樣的句型表達，與自己的相比，爲何寫的好。這比單純的背誦人家寫好的雅思範文，又或是自己不斷的苦寫，而不懂積累，效果要好很多。這個方法很簡單，但對雅思寫作水平提升效果不是很大。
雅思寫作中重要的構成因素，除了單詞和語法以外，“思維”很重要。如果考生們仍然是根據中國人的語言和文化習慣寫作，如此的文章西方人有時不可能明白的。
雖然寫作沒有固定格式，用有效表意當成是核心內容。但不論纔開始練習寫作時大家的文章佈局有多麼的刻板，而後的行文又有多自如，當中有一原則是大家從始至終都需要把握好的，其實是自己說的觀點，自己必須要把相應的論據提出來證明。
這種原則叫做橫豎原則。“橫”是大家的觀點，“豎”是對觀點證明的一個論據。論據要細節化，別想使用一個觀點把另一個觀點證明，用一個抽象去解釋另一個抽象。
有關練習雅思寫作的一些素材，可以選擇雅思滿分範文從模仿寫作練起。若考生們處在時間緊任務重的學習狀態與考試壓力之下，提醒大家必須要同時進行大量閱讀範文與模仿寫作。
雅思寫作範文：科學與藝術同等重要
People still value artists in the age of advanced science and technology. What are the reasons? Are arts as important as science and technology?
在先進的科學技術時代，人們仍然重視藝術家。原因是什麼?藝術和科技同等重要嗎?
參考範文：
The advanced technology and cutting-edge breakthrough of science usher in an age when the obsession with logic and rationality elbow its way to the spotlight of public. However, art or the artists, the relatively sentimental part of human mind, still deserves a place for its irreplaceable importance.
It is apparent that the intrinsic characteristics of human being’s mind make artists an indispensable role of mankind. The essence of arts is its natural outflow of human emotion and their perception to the world from a subjective and self-oriented perspective, which can arouse a mental echo of the thirst for beauty and the probation of the primitive state of mind. Although we have lived in a world beaming with the hustle and bustle brought by technology, we still need musicians to compose the melodious tunes and painters to depict the magnificence of landscape. Vincent Van Gogh’s Starry Night will not pale compared with the stunning Hubble telescope.
The importance of art cannot be underestimated for the simple reason that its benefits will make a difference to human, albeit the dominance of technology. The pace of modern life has been inevitably accelerated due to the penetration of technological devices such as new media and machines, whose tyranny drains energy and paralyses our sense to the beauty of world. This circumstance is likely to be eased because art can present the aesthetic bliss and therefore reduce the fatigue and tiresome. It seems that the exhaustive soul can be nourished in the company of a light-hearted classic music and a piece of oil painting. We need the soothing comfort of art, as the advancement of our logic is always entwined with the call of our nature.
(281 words)
雅思寫作範文：24小時電視節目的利弊
In some countries, TV programs are transmitted throughout the day and night. Some people think that 24-hour TV transmission is a positive development, while others it is negative. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
在一些國家，電視節目在白天和黑夜都播送。有些人認爲24小時電視傳輸是一個積極的發展，而另一些人則持消極態度。討論兩種觀點並給出你自己的看法。
思路解析：
1. 不間斷的電視新聞直播帶來的好處是，人們總是能獲取最新的信息，這讓人們能瞭解到社會，甚至是全球的經濟，科學，軍事，政治，文化的最新變化，這些新鮮信息讓觀衆的思維和知識不斷更新，跟上社會的快速發展。
2. 第二個好處是，不管在白天黑夜，24小時的電視能把最新的緊急信息推送給大衆，如關於地震，海嘯，颱風等自然災害的，這是非常必要的提醒，讓人們及時作出反應和準備來避免危險。
3. 壞處在於，它讓人們過於沉迷虛擬世界。舉例，爲了看午夜劇，人們很可能會犧牲掉睡覺的時間，這不僅損害健康，也影響到電視迷們第二天的工作表現。
參考範文：
Nowadays, 24-hour TV news and programs have overwhelming in living or bed rooms in families. In my view, this transmission mode brings both advantages and disadvantages simultaneously, and my reasons would be explored as below.
None-stop broadcasting of TV can provide the latest information to the public with the whole-day availability, which can help viewers overcome the limitation of time and keep pace with this fast-changing society. For example, 24-hour news cycles at night can consistently present up-to-date domestic and international news reports, from economy to diplomacy, from science to war, thus quenching the thirst of acquiring fresh information among groups who have high sensitivity to news, like stockbrokers, businessmen and politicians. In addition, some emergent and important events need 24-hour TV to inform the billions of people on this planet, such as forecasts of bad weathers, natural disasters, as well as the alarming of earthquakes and tsunamis. Consequently, the in-time availability of critical news ensures the safety of all social individuals, by immediately reminding them to make preparation and prevention.
However, with exposure to consistent TV programs, couch potatoes would indulge in a sedentary lifestyle that is detrimental to their health and work, physically and mentally. Firstly, Watching TV at midnight makes the deprivation of sleep among viewers, thus declining their physical health, disordering their day-time schedules, and reducing their productivity in workplace in the next day. Secondly, when people put all attentions and energy in the virtual world on the TV screen, they would lose the interests in the interpersonal communication. That is to say, long-time watching TV serves to isolate the audience from each other, and finally trapping them into negative emotions of depression, loneliness and anxiety.
In conclusion, my opinion is watching TV in moderation is positive, because it can timely offer useful and essential information to the public, which is beneficial for their interests and safety. However, we should be circumspect about the addition in watching TV day and night; otherwise this ill behavior would do harms to the health, work performance and mentality of the audience.
(342 words)
雅思寫作範文：警察是否該配槍
Task：Some believe policemen should be armed with guns in order to prevent street crimes. However, others think this measure would raise the level of social violence. What is your opinion?
思路解析：
應該配槍:
1. 在一個槍支氾濫的時代，配槍能保護警察自身。
2. 幫助警察迅速的打擊和制止罪犯。
3. 是有效的威懾來預防那些潛在犯罪。
不應該配槍：
1. 槍支可能被濫用。
2. 誤傷羣衆。
3. 被偷被搶怎麼辦。
4. 刺激罪犯進行新一輪的火力採購，形成軍備競賽。
參考範文：
As opposed to the extensive use of weapons in the US, people in the UK, even the police are not allowed to take guns. Some people argue that it may trigger off insecurity of city dwellers, whereas others assert that it can eliminate the whole violence in the society. Hereby, I would like to discuss both perspectives in the following paragraphs.
Some people believe that the absence of carrying guns is disadvantageous in many aspects in any nations. It has been a trend that the violence is increasing in various parts of the world. More and more criminals these days carry guns and other dangerous weapons, but our police force only have pepper spray and batons for protection (as well as bullet proof vests). This is not enough of a deterrent, not enough in today’s society. If the police have proper equipment, such as, carrying a gun, they would hopefully not lose their lives and the residents will feel safer and better protected.
Others, however, hold the opinion that the police should not be allowed to carry guns. There have been plenty of cases that some robbers or thieves who commit crime but do not deserve death were shot down by police. Furthermore, some unqualified and irresponsible policemen may hurt some innocent citizens even to death when they are pursuing some culprits. Additionally, guns of police may often be lost and will touch off an even worse situation. And thus, it will reduce the overall violence in our society by not allowing guns to the police.
In conclusion, both opponents and proponents of such a practice have their respective reasons and justifications. However, as a person always expecting a peaceful life, I personally agree with the latter view. If the guns and some of other weapons would be totally restricted in the modern globe, the serious phenomenon of violence and other relevant behaviors would vanish. Hence, it is my sincere wish that governments of other countries would follow the example of the UK to avoid the whole violence in the world.
(343 words)
