雅思寫作大小作文佔分比例是多少
爲了幫助大家備考雅思寫作，提高寫作水平，下面小編給大家帶來雅思寫作大小作文佔分比例是多少，希望大家喜歡!
雅思寫作大小作文佔分比例是多少
相信很多的烤鴨都聽過老師們說的一句話：“上了考場先寫大作文，大作文佔分重”. 的確，在雅思官方的評分當中，大作文佔據了2/3的評分，而小作文只佔1/3. 單純從這個角度來看，的確雅思大作文更爲重要。
雅思寫作大小作文佔分比例是多少?
在實戰考試中，其實對於大部分學生來說，大小作文佔比其實是1:1的關係。
首先，我們現在講述一個數據統計：
在中國地區，雅思寫作的平均分數爲5.2分
通過上述圖表，我相信我們所有的烤鴨都可以看出，其實大部分的學生的分數段都集中在5分，5.5分，和6分這三個階段!換句話而言，從5分到6分的學生佔所有雅思學生的85%左右。
總結：85%左右的學生分數在5-6分這個區間內
大小作文分數分佈圖：
通過圖表：大家可以看出：
A：小作文5.5，大作文5
B：小作文6，大作文5.5
除了以上兩種情況外，其餘分數算法情況，大家的分數都是和平均分算出的結果一致。
結論：因此大小作文評分雖然是按照2:1的權重進行評分，但是在實際評分中，由於學生兩項分差幾乎不可能超過1分，所以最終結果與平均分算法相同。
雅思寫作8分範文：維護道路安全
Recent years have witnessed a worsening trend in road safety. According to statistics from the local authority, the number of traffic accidents in 2004 was 20% greater than that of the previous year. The issue is gaining more and more concern of the public, some of whom propose that stricter punishment on traffic offenders should be the only way to ensure road safety. As far as I am concerned, I hold that punishment should not be only solution to the problem.
There is certainly no denying that stricter penalties may to some extent bring down the number of accidents on motorways as a deterrent to driving offences. Besides, the government may enjoy a greater revenue from severer fines, which can in turn be used to improve road conditions.
However, we shall never overlook the other side of the coin: punishment has its downsides. Fines, as the most common penalty for driving violations, tend to instill in people the misconception that money can pay off their guilt and resolve the problem. As a result, we can see many cases where the traffic offender commits the same or another mistake even after having been fined a lot. In spite of heavier punishment, road safety cannot be enhanced unless drivers are equipped with sufficient driving skills and knowledge. Recently there have emerged many irresponsible driving schools that have produced a host of unqualified drivers, contributing to more traffic offences. Thus tight control on driving schools and the driving testing system is needed as well to improve road safety. Furthermore, advertisements and campaigns concerned should be launched to raise the public awareness. When people are fully aware of the importance of abiding traffic rules, accidents may hopefully be eliminated.
From the above discussion, it is clear that only stricter punishment is not enough to enhance road safety. Instead, it should go hand in hand with closer control on driving schools and the testing system as well as higher public awareness.
雅思寫作7分範文：違章懲罰有助維護道路安全嗎?
Whether stricter punishments is the only way to prevent accidents from happening on roads has triggered a controversial debate Attitudes towards this issue vary greatly. It is wiser to take a closer look at both sides before I present my opinion.
Advocates firmly believe that it is sensible to impose stricter penalty on those who break the traffic rules. Drivers will be more careful when they consider the punishment hard to afford. As the fine is not high,it is not deterrent . According to a survey , among the drivers questioned , 65% of them admit that they pay more attention to driving if more serious punishments are carried out .
Opponents, however, hold the view that there are other aspects which can decrease the frequency of accidents. Firstly, road constructions should be more rational. Nowadays, more and more roads and highways are being built, but some of them were not designed appropriately, which sometimes cause traffic accidents. Secondly, pedestrians should heighten their safety awareness while crossing the roads . Some pedestrians disobey rules and regulations, which should assume the responsibilities of accidents and be penalized. The last but not least, the growing amount of private cars is a contributing factor, the government should put forward some feasible means to control the number of cars ., such as imposing higher tax or limiting the cars running on roads at rush hours .
As far as I am concerned, I am in favor of the latter view. Only stricter punishment is not insufficient access to decrease accidents., other methods should be enforced simultaneously , such as reinforcing supervising and setting digital camera on roads .
雅思寫作7分範文：應該用動物做實驗嗎?
Nowadays, experimental usage of animal has become a widely concerned issue around the world. People hold diverse views towards it.
Adversaries claim that it is an extremely crude behavior. Animals, especially mammals, like dogs, cats, rabbits, rats, which are the major victims in the experimentation, are usually human’s pets. Pets owner are strongly against it for they firmly believe that animals suffer physically and mentally as we do. When equality is advocated in the modern world, it is inhuman to disrespect creatures that are not human beings. Furthermore, a number of experts pointed out that it would be at high stake of depend on the results of animal experiment; since they differ from us in many ways, take the body structure for example, we can’t imagine humans try to jump from the height of nine stories without any protection because cats survive out of the same test.
Those in favor of the idea about usage of animal declare that using animal is an advisable choice. On one hand because their bodies function similar to ours, for instance, they catch colds, suffer from stomachs and heart diseases, which more importantly influenced by diet and habits. The consequences of the test may not be applied to humans, although they are highly connected to the human situations. On the other hand, those creatures yell and act abnormally when they feel uncomfortable, which is what exactly researchers expect. In addition, there is an easy-to-answer question: isn’t it crueler to test directly on people with little knowledge on the objects’ effects? In a word, there is nothing better than animal that resemble human the best for experiment.
Personally, I am not a supporter of animal experiments, yet there is anything more suitable that can replace them, I accept using animals for tests, but take good care of them when they are not in the laboratory.
