雅思A類寫作教材推薦這7本書給你
A類雅思寫作教材推薦這7本書給你爲你帶來備考A類雅思，也就是學術類雅思的寫作部分時可以參考的書籍。雅思寫作分爲大作文和小作文，大作文是根據題幹給到的話題寫一篇立論作文，小作文是根據題目給到的圖表寫篇描述型的文章。寫作應該怎樣備考呢?有哪些寫作的書我們可以參考呢?我們接下來就爲你介紹。
雅思A類寫作教材推薦這7本書給你
練習的首選材料依然是真題。
劍橋系列後面附有考官的範文，很值得研究。其他反響較好的練習材料有：
1、《十天突破雅思寫作》
這本書的江湖地位不用多說。基本一提到雅思寫作，就必會有人推薦此書，簡直就是《聖經》一般的地位。客觀的講，書籍能夠風靡，自然有一定的道理。這本書算得上是很實用基礎的輔導教材，裏面的內容包括雅思寫作技巧、常見的錯誤、亮點的詞彙和句型。值得好好研究。但是不要生硬地照搬，否則畫虎不成反類犬。
2、《雅思8分萬能作文》
這書經常拿來和十天相提並論，是考官所寫的書。裏面收錄了考官所寫的範文。可以借鑑。
3、《雅思寫作套路剖析與範例大全》
這書比較厚，講的也很細，從語法到句子再到範文，和十天一個套路的。可以看看，多借鑑一些寫作思路總沒有壞處。
4、朗文出版，《Writing Academic English》
這不是專門爲雅思考試量身定做的，但也許是雅思寫作最給力的書籍。因爲雅思寫作的大作文，考的就是學術寫作。書籍適合雅思考試想考高分的人(6.5-7分)，因爲是全方位的講解，裏面對結構、邏輯、上下文銜接的問題解釋的很清楚，適合基礎不錯力求高分的人。畢竟是英文原版書籍，看起來多少有些吃力。但如果能啃完，嘿嘿，會受益匪淺的。
同爲英文原版書籍，Macmillan出了本《Improve Your IELTS Writing Skills 》，專門針對雅思考試的。書籍沒有上面那本的口碑好，有時間的話，可以翻一翻，對照着做參考。
5、語法書。
語法書列在這裏可能有些突兀，其實不然。雅思裏面沒有直接的語法考題，但是其實處處涉及語法。語法不好，閱讀長難句一定會覺得吃力，而最直接的表現就會是在寫作裏。語法是語言的章法，不過關的話，寫出的句子是對是錯都無法判斷，甚至無法讓人讀懂。此書適合語法不好、寫作功底薄弱的人，不要過分的好高騖遠，寫作功底是一點一滴的積累起來的。
劍橋官方出了本《劍橋雅思語法》，針對雅思的語法練習，再合適不過了：
《百變語法》，也比較有名：
6、《劍橋圖表》和《品讀劍橋》PDF文件。
這是互聯網上的牛人原創的作品。對劍橋系列後面的範文的點評和總結，適合作爲真題寫作的輔助材料。一個人的思維總是有侷限的，閱讀他人的作品，就是了解他人的思路，最終讓自己受益。
常見的寫作材料是以上幾種。輔導書是輔助用的，關鍵還是要考自己多練習。Practice makes perfect。
按目標分數選雅思寫作備考書
寫作(目標分數：5.5分)：
7、《十天突破雅思寫作》
對於基礎並不好的5.5分黨這本書的詞彙是短期能提分的，但對於出國讀研的同學，這本書目前是真心不夠的。對了，此書要配合雅思寫作老師使用，如果自己不寫作文的話，那這書其實也不用看，直接考興許5.5
以上就是雅思A類寫作教材推薦這7本書給你的全部內容，在看這些雅思寫作教材的時候，我們應該怎麼看呢?一個是要注意其中的好詞好句，也就是可以複用的單詞和句型，以及表達方式。一個是注意範文的架構和寫作思路，學習好的範文的架構和寫作思路能夠讓我們的文章更清晰，更一目瞭然。
雅思大作文：it is necessary to teach children the skill of handwriting
雅思大作文題目：In modern age, some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
作文範文：
With the advent of the typewriter, more and more text works has been done by Keyboard or even vocal input. Therefore, there is a claim that children nowadays need not to exert their great efforts in learning how to write.
At the first glare, this point of view has its own ground. Compared with handwriting, first of all, It is both efficient and fashionable to write something by typing with a keyboard orrelying on vocal interpretation-imagine the scenario in which a columnist is doing his or her writing with a laptop in the cafe. As well as that, modern input techniques can be regarded as terrific tools as it does not interrupt the writer's stream of thought if being very skillful in utilizing them.
However, it should be recognized that learning through writing has decided advantages. The greatest one is that handwriting facilitates knowledge acquisition, especially for the children. While they are taking notes by hand, this heavier and less efficient labor actually requires the coordination among their brains, hands and eyes, but the reward is a long lasting memory and better understanding. Pencraft, if any children would achieve, has a more profound importance as it could be regarded as a kind of art and even a cultural identity. This would help the children in the long run make money out of this and preserve this precious cultural heritage.
In conclusion, I almost disagree with the statement. This does not mean the typewriting is worse than pen and ink, but for the sake of education, this sort of training is very fundamental and no nation can afford the consequences.
雅思大作文：it is irrational to forbid the animal products
雅思大作文題目：In modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products, for instance, clothing and medicines. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience.
作文範文：
With the advance of the technology, a colossal number of animal products can be replaced by artificial or synthetic elements in the modern society. As a result, many people claim that there is no longer necessary to consume animals to produce any food, clothing, and medicines. But I personally believe such opinion is invalid.
At no circumstance, can the animal products be replaced. First of all, human body cannot depart from meat, since our muscles is built by absorbing the protein coming from meat. And a huge number of necessary nutrition which is crucial to maintain our whole physical system also come animal food products. Thus, without meat, there would be negative effects on our health. In addition, abandoning all the animal products will definitely curb the augment of the economy. More specifically, ifthe market does not consume the animal products any more, animal husbandry would be totally destroyed, generating the unemployment of hundreds of thousands of farmers, then relatively, social instability would appear and the economy would collapse. Clearly, it is irrational to forbid the animal products.
However, some people argue that human beings have the obligation to stop use any animal products as the technology has way developed than before so that the substitution of animal products can be easily found. Unfortunately, such advocate fail to recognize the reality that many animal products, especially some medicines, cannot be replaced. Furthermore, these people do not distinguish the concept between animal preservation and animal products consumption. In other words, to abandon the animal products is not the best way to protect the animal.
In conclusion, it is to early to abandon all the animal products, regardless of the valid alternatives resulting from the advance of the technology. And accordingly, the averages should understand that rejecting any animal products dose not stand for the animal protection.
雅思大作文： nursing homes in modern society
雅思大作文題目：Nowadays some older people choose to live in the retirement communities with other people rather than living with their adult children. Is it a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience.
作文範文：
Decades of low birth rate indeveloped countries have caused a greater proportion of senior population and thus the working-age population has more obvious stress in coping with daily job and taking care of old retired parents at the same time. Therefore, more senior citizens have turned to nursing homes and it is believed to be reasonable and feasible despite certain apparent drawbacks.
Professional nursing institutions benefit different parties. For their customers, peer-to-peer contact of similar age helps psychological and mental well-being as they share similar social background in which topics of common interests are frequently spoken of andactivities suitable for the aged can be organized because of the easy access to partners. In addition, they can enjoy professional daily care on hygiene and medicine, guaranteeing the physical health and hence prolonging life span. Another two parties benefited indirectly are their adult children and the business market, the former can focus more on their own life and work and the latter need not worry about the employees’ attendance and stability.
However, the retired person may still suffer from two conditions, the aloof offspring and the short of money. To be precise, the elderly may face the risk that the family may never orscarcely pay a visit and it is a cruel and pathetic situation which happens indeed as the cases stand. It is more pitiful that all the retired are not pensioners in some countries, which means they either choose to live independently, which gets harder in the aging process, or to ask for the provision from descendants when others not.
To sum up, nursing homes in modern society is a feasible and inevitable approach and it generally has greater advantages. However, some suggestions like a better pension system and strict regulations on these organizations can be taken to ensure the happiness in everyone’s later life.
